跳到主要內容

1988年12月1日

1分鐘閱讀

氡的再審視

其危險性和補救措施的價值均存在爭議

作者：蒂姆·比爾茲利

加入我們科學愛好者的社群！

電子郵件地址

我同意我的資訊將按照《大眾科學》和 Springer Nature Limited 的隱私政策進行處理。

00

More by Tim Beardsley

This article was originally published with the title “Radon Retried” in 大眾科學 Magazine Vol. 259 No. 6 (December 1988), p. 18
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1288-18

View This Issue

Expand Your World with Science

Learn and share the most exciting discoveries, innovations and ideas shaping our world today.

Subscribe Sign up for our newsletters See the latest stories Read the latest issue Give a Gift Subscription

Follow Us:

Return & Refund Policy
About
Press Room

FAQs
Contact Us
International Editions

Advertise
Accessibility Statement
Terms of Use

Privacy Policy
California Consumer Privacy Statement
Use of cookies/Do not sell my data

大眾科學 is part of Springer Nature, which owns or has commercial relations with thousands of scientific publications (many of them can be found at www.springernature.com/us). 大眾科學 maintains a strict policy of editorial independence in reporting developments in science to our readers.

© 2024 大眾科學, A DIVISION OF SPRINGER NATURE AMERICA, INC.
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

© .